Product Safety and Market Surveillance, strengthening confidence and competitiveness in the European marketplace

Published: 27 May 2013

Policies & Issues: Internal Market - Compliance, Standards & Enforcement

Orgalime welcomes the objectives of the Product Safety and Market Surveillance Package as it strives to simplify and bring coherence to the legal framework for an improved enforcement of internal market rules. However, we invite the European Council and Parliament to adapt those features of the Package which, in our view, may undermine the objectives of simplification, coherence and proportionality, to the detriment of both European manufacturers’ competitiveness and the safety of consumers.

Product safety and enforcement of internal market legislation would be further simplified if:

  • The ‘risk’ assessment to be carried out by the market surveillance authorities includes as a first step the compliance check with applicable Union harmonisation legislation;
  • The scope of the Consumer Product Safety Regulation’s (CPSR) is clearly limited to non-harmonised consumer products;
  • The unnecessary and costly indication of origin on consumer products is removed.

Product safety and enforcement of internal market legislation would be more coherent if:

  • Obligations of economic operators were better aligned with Decision 768/2008, taking into account all possibilities of reducing administrative burden;
  • European reference laboratories were accredited their role clarified so that they do not compete with conformity assessment bodies;
  • The room for discretionary decisions by market surveillance authorities was minimised;
  • The implementing powers conferred on the Commission had a limited scope and time-span
  • The voluntary nature of standards was preserved;

Product safety and enforcement of internal market legislation would be more proportional if:

  • Sanctions and penalties were related to the severity of the infringement and the level of illegitimate revenue derived from it, instead of the size of the undertaking;
  • Economic operators were granted a cost-efficient right to redress;
  • The precautionary principle is not used at enforcement level;
  • Mandatory third-party certification is not introduced under the package.

Related Position Papers

Internal Market: Joint Industry recommendations for effective Harmonised Standardisation [6 July 2021]

Internal Market: Joint open letter on industry competitiveness and EU standardisation [1 February 2021]

Internal Market: Orgalim comments on the NLF evaluation roadmap [2 December 2020]

Internal Market: Orgalim comments on the 2020 draft Blue Guide [13 November 2020]

Internal Market: Orgalim comments on the Draft Guidelines for the practical implementation of Article 4 of Regulation 2019/1020 on market surveillance and compliance of products [22 April 2020]

Internal Market: Shaping a New Deal for the Single Market: Harmonised standards in support of a competitive European industry [27 January 2020]

Internal Market: Suggestions for a revision of the Blue Guide on the implementation of EU product rules 2016 [27 January 2020]

Internal Market: For a restored mutual trust in a market-relevant European Standardisation System [24 September 2019]

Towards effective, efficient EU market surveillance: all for a level-playing field without additional burdens for legitimate manufacturers [6 December 2018]