Economic consequences of the revision of the Machinery Directive : costs in terms of man

Published: 5 July 2004

Policies & Issues: Internal Market - Product Safety Legislation

Orgalime is against the revision of the Machinery Directive.  We believe that this piece of legislation does not need an overhaul at this time, as the European mechanical engineering industry needs regulatory stability and not an increased bureacratic burden.  Industry expects that the revision of the Machinery Directive will entail costs in terms of additional effort for companies (expressed in man-days of qualified workers and engineers checking on the proposed changes).

These figures for five main areas are stated in the report below...

Related Position Papers

Internal Market: Common understanding of the term “Internet-connected radio equipment” [13 September 2022]

Internal Market: Orgalim position paper on the transition period for Delegated Regulation on Outdoor Noise Directive 2000/14/EC [15 July 2022]

Internal Market: Position and recommendations from Europe’s technology industries on the proposed new Construction Products Regulation [12 July 2022]

Internal Market: Orgalim review of options for PED Guideline C-13 [15 December 2021]

Internal Market: Orgalim position on the proposal for a General Product Safety Regulation [3 December 2021]

Internal Market: Machinery Proposal - Mandatory third party certification is a step backwards [11 October 2021]

Internal Market: Joint industry statement on priorities for the Machinery Products Regulation [4 October 2021]

Internal Market: Orgalim input to the European Commission Consultation on the proposal for a new Machinery Products Regulation “Machinery Directive Revision” [16 August 2021]

Internal market: Orgalim comments on the draft delegated act for internet-connected radio equipment and wearables [10 March 2021]